The Biostratigraphy Period
With the growth of the oil industry in the 1940’s through
1960’s, paleontology took a different, more utilitarian direction
from the previous century and a half. Since the time of William
Smith, who in the 1700’s created the first geologic map, it
had been known that rocks could be equated (correlated) in different
areas based on their fossil content. This ability to correlate became
known as the sub-discipline of stratigraphy. In the efforts
to recover oil during the mid-Twentieth Century, fossils were used
as a tool for the recognition of age-specific drilling targets and
for correlation of productive rock layers within and between oil
fields. The use of fossils in this way gave rise to the sub-discipline
of biostratigraphy. However, the immediate consequence
was that paleontology was regarded as a sub-discipline of the field
of stratigraphy, rather than as a separate field of its own.
The Paleobiology Period
By the late 1960’s it was recognized, through a number of
seminal works, that invertebrate fossils were distributed through
the rock record not only with respect to time but also to space.
The recognition that certain genera and species recurred within
certain rock types (lithologies) led researchers to the initiation
of the field of paleoecology. It is the concept that fossils
lived in biologic communities and were captured in time in the rock
record. This in turn led to the creation of the sub-discipline that
is part biology and part geology known as paleobiology.
Like paleontology before it, the new field of paleobiology exhibited
growth stages. The 1970’s can be called the "paleoecology
stage." During this time, much of the literature dealt with
the ecology of ancient communities and how they were distributed
through time and space. By the 1980’s the emphasis had switched
to major extinction events and how the Earth's biosphere evolved
in relation to these catastrophic biotic periods. In the 1990’s
the science moved toward recognition of major evolutionary events,
and the relationships between ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary
tempo.
Although early paleobiologists developed elaborate theories based
on Treatise information, basic paleontology continued to
describe new species and update ranges of taxa during the 1960’s
to 1990’s. Thus, many of the early paleobiologic hypotheses
are replete with erroneous assumptions, because the authors relied
solely on outdated Treatise information and had failed
to incorporate new taxonomic material. So overwhelming was this
new information that an updated Treatise had to be published
in multiple volumes.
Page 3: Curator History